Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Journal of Translational Medicine

Fig. 3

From: Non-invasive imaging with ICOS-targeting monoclonal antibody for preclinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in a humanized mouse model

Fig. 3

A Representative immunofluorescence staining of paw tissues showing the expression of CD3 (red) and ICOS (green) at day3 (scale bar: 100 μm). White arrows indicate cells that colocalize. B Pie Chart and FACS analysis of ICOS expression on CD4 and CD8 T cells in BM of huPBMC-AIA (n = 6) and control group (n = 4) at day7. C tSNE plot and FACS analysis of ICOS expression on CD4 and CD8 T cells in paw of huPBMC-AIA (n = 6) and control group(n = 4) at day7. D Correlation between paw thickness measurements and percentage of human CD45+CD4+ICOS+ cells at the day7 time point. E Principal component analysis identifies major mediators distinguishing huPBMC-AIA mice from control mice. Each dot represents an individual mouse(left). Each line represents key drivers of the delineation. All values represent the mean ± SEM unless otherwise specified. t test was conducted for statistical significance. ****, p < 0.0001; ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; ns p > 0.05

Back to article page