Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Translational Medicine

Fig. 2

From: Exploring ribosome biogenesis in lung adenocarcinoma to advance prognostic methods and immunotherapy strategies

Fig. 2

Characterization of RiboSis-related genes in LUAD scRNA-seq data. (A) Following dimensionality reduction and clustering, cells from 9 LUAD samples were grouped into 24 cell clusters. (B) Cell annotation yielded 9 cell subtypes. (C) Bubble plot displaying typical marker genes for the 9 cell subtypes. (D) Expression distribution of 9 typical marker genes across samples. (E) Violin plots comparing RiboSis activity scores of the 9 cell subtypes. B cells and T cells exhibit higher RiboSis activity scores, while endothelial cells, plasma cells, and epithelial cells show lower RiboSis activity scores. (F) UMAP plot illustrating the cell distribution of high and low RiboSis-AUC groups. (G) Network plot comparing cell communication quantity and intensity between high and low RiboSis-AUC groups. (H) Contrasting incoming and outgoing interaction strengths among different cell subtypes between high and low RiboSis-AUC groups. (I, J) Comparison of signaling pathway strengths between high and low RiboSis-AUC groups. (K) Upregulated and downregulated ligand-receptor pairs in different cell subtypes of high and low RiboSis-AUC groups

Back to article page